Forta Proposal 3 (FP-3): Forta Delegated Staking

[baozi]

Tokens should be given more scenarios in the future rather than Staking

[baozi]

In the future, customers need to buy tokens to enjoy the service

[DiRiK]

But now there is not even staking. And you propose to make it limited to a small amount. I will repeat the question - why should I buy tokens?

[anurg]

Delegation is a very welcome proposal for the growth of FORTA and the idea behind the proposed rules is also good. The proposal needs some minor tweaking (my personal opinion) so that Community Node runners from Fortification Stage are taken care of. Clarity in Proposal is very much required.My points are:-

1. Clear definition of Parameters with Weightage for Bot Assignment
2. Clear definition of Parameters with weightage for Rewards Calculation
3. Foundation Support to Node Runners from Fortification Phase till some period otherwise it feels like a set back to support the network and when it reaches a critical mass, Initial supporters are left behind. The support could be in any other form also to bring them to a level playing field with Other Big Node Providers. You can give some privileges to POAP holder node runners
4. I raised this point earlier also that some bots are like using so many rpc requests and if you are the unlucky Node hosting such bots, breaking even for that node becomes impossible. So This factor should also be considered in bot staking amount as well as rewards for the node.

Let make FORTA win…

[DiRiK]

In the future, people will fly to the moon. Do I need to buy a ticket now?

[baozi]

i agree 25k，just want more details？ok？

[baozi]

You just don’t want your token price to keep falling

[DiRiK]

I agree that the proposal with bots is incomprehensible, because there are very few bots. And there is no formula. Therefore, I propose to remove this part of the proposal in this vote or clarify the formula.

And I want the price of our token to be protected by liquidity

I’m not looking for free rewards.

[DiRiK]

If someone does not have money to invest, should they receive the same reward as those who have invested more?

Why are so many people suggesting this? It is nonsense

[baozi]

Individual bots are difficult to control, and the sla is very low, even if you have good hardware and bandwidth

[Forta-Foundation]

Governance Update

FP-4 on Delegated Staking is now live on the Forta governance forum

In response to FP-3’s no vote, the Forta Governance Council carefully crafted a new proposal taking into account the community suggestions

Forta Proposal on Delegated Staking (FP-4)

Forta Delegated Staking The Forta Governance Council is seeking community feedback and approval of this “FP-4” proposal relating to delegated staking. FP-4 incorporates the community feedback on FP-3 and proposes the following actions that are designed to further increase the security and reliability of the Forta network: 1. Delegated staking: modify the Forta staking smart contracts to add support for delegators to delegate stakes to node owners, and give node owners the ability to assign del…

[DiRiK]

@anurg

Hi DiRiK, I think no one is suggesting that. We all want delegators to earn and FORTA to grow. Suddenly changing rules with such high Staking requirements is definitely not helping existing Small node runners and helping to bring Big players who already have advantage by being Delegators on some other chain. This step will WIPE out small node runners who have helped FORTA grow to this level. We need some protection for those…Anyway ultimately what Majority who holds more tokens think & What direction Foundation wants to move this Project, their View will Win…

Delegates earn while FORTA grows. Current executors of small nodes have the same privileges as large players. Excuse me, but do you even understand what you write? I don’t want to offend you, but I think this is very stupid

[DiRiK]

The result of your judgments is visible now, when the token falls. Do you still want to kill the project?